* If the Political system no longer represents us, then we must look for alternatives. * If corporations no longer represent our values then we must look for alternatives. * If the media no longer represent us, then we must look for alternatives.
We are the 99%, and it’s time to let the 1% know that this world is our world, and if we aren’t happy with the way it is run, then it’s time to take it back. It’s time to show them what a REAL democracy looks like.
Because these streets are our streets, this city is our city, this movement is our movement, and together we can affect real change.
Whether the 1% like it or not, Power is coming back to the People and we are...
United for #Globalchange.
the final message 'told' or sung by konstantin wecker ~ empört euch (= ca. stand against)
für mich wäre echte direkte demokratie sicherlich besser als die heutige, von paar wenigen mächtigen über massenmedien und politikdarsteller gelenkte welt. so gäbe es wenigstens keine kriege a la afghanistan (große mehrheit ist bekanntlich dagegen) oder bankenrettungen auf kosten der steuerzahler. aber demokratie an sich ist echt nicht besonders gut, denn es ist immer die herrschaft der mehrheit über die minderheiten. mein beispiel vom letzten plenum über den demokratisch gewählten hitler + seine nazis und die bitteren folgen für kommunisten, SPDler, gewerkschafter, schwule, juden, meinugsfreiheit, usw hast ja sicherlich noch in erinnerung. eine mehrheit wird nämlich leider immer dafür wählen / abstimmen, die minderheiten auszurauben oder die negativen folgen des eigenen handelns den anderen aufzubürden.
was wir m.m.n. brauchen, sind GRUNDFREIHEITEN für ALLE. also z.b. meinungsfreiheit, pressefreiheit, religionsfreihet, (weltweit visafreie) bewegungsfreiheit, persönliche freiheit, usw und zwar wirklich FÜR ALLE, auch für minderheiten und nicht nur für eine 'demokratische mehrheit' ...
ps: dem hitler reichte damals in 1933 eine demokratische mehrheit von knapp 52% (nsdap + kswr), hier der wiki-eintrag diesbzgl: Reichstagswahl_1933
also demokratie oder doch besser eine (herrschaftsfreie?) libertäre gesellschaft mit freien menschen in freien vereinbarungen? wie auch immer, ich freue mich schon auf deinen vortrag.
pps: liebe edjm, keine angst, ich habe nicht vor, der spammeister der gruppe zu werden. da das thema demokratie so zentral/wichtig in unseren überlegungen und hoffnungen ist, kann es nicht schaden, sich auch eine 'paar stufen bessere welt' vorzustellen, oder?
~~~ jörg bergstedt's herrschaftsfreie welt: ein bereits funkionierendes beispiel? in der software industrie (wohl aufgrund der dort hohen gehälter, die schon bei paar wenigen arbeitstagen im monat die lebenskosten decken und den rest nutzen einige leute für 'gute sachen') gibt es open access + open source projekte wie z.b. LINUX, FIREFOX, WIKIPEDIA, wo es keine patente und ähnliches gibt, wo alles allen gehört und alle haben drauf zugriff und jede(r) die aktuelle lösung verbessern kann um sie so für allen besser zu machen ... eigentlich ganz einfach, oder? und ja, in so einer welt wäre geld überflüssig / nicht vorhanden, also ganz anders als die ständige in-wert-setzung von allem im kapitalismus ...
zitat eines tages:The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. ~ James Madison (1751-1836)
zitat des tages: It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part ... If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure. ~ James Madison (1751-1836)
many interesting thoughts about freedom + free society ~ jeff berwick interviewed by the daily bell interviewed by the daily bell ~ just one Q & A here to show you the kind of stuff that interview is about and yes, jeff compared the current US to pre-World War II Germany later in the interview ...
Daily Bell: Give us some background, for readers who don't know you.
Jeff Berwick: I've been interviewed twice in the past by The Daily Bell so those who are interested can look at those interviews for a more detailed answer on my history. What I am really, though, is a truth-seeker. I want to know what the truth is and am not scared to dig far down the rabbit hole to find it. Secondly, I don't believe in thinking collectively when it comes to nations, but I do have a warm spot in my heart for humanity as a whole, and also for all the wondrous living things that are here on this space rock with us. And, because of that, I want to see everyone and everything living as happily as they can. It is my opinion, certainly as far as humanity is concerned, that the best way to make that happen is to spread the word of freedom and to rally against those who try to enslave and oppress others. Those people most often are the ones pulling the levers of government ... one of the worst ideas still being propagated on this planet.
Freedom from governments and the centralized violence of their laws and regulations isn't a desire to hurt or damage others or the environment; it's the only moral system and it turns out that it is has the very real side effect of constantly driving technological progress and standards of living.
btw, you can learn a lot about a domination free world from jörg bergstedt (and also order some of his books in german language)
mehr zum thema #demokratie #democracy #freedom #anarchy #anarchocapitalism später oder nie :-)
omg, what a speech (5 minutes) ... matt damon reads howard zinn's words ... civil disobedience to save the world ...
... Matt Damon isn’t asking you to start a revolution, but when you hear this, you might anyway. If you don’t love what you’re hearing after the first 29 seconds, jump to 3:31 for a nugget of truth that every American can stand behind.
i've found a nice picture drawn by molly in the last article about hactivist jeremy hammond recently sentenced to 10 years in jail and yes, i've followed the link to author's profile. i was impressed to learn molly crabapple is occupies best known artist and then i've opened video file with a great, great interview she gave the VICE program (see below) =>ENJOY :-)
the system fights back hardly, hactivist jeremy hammond (28) sentenced to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to participating in the anonymous hack into the computers of the private intelligence firm Strategic Forecasting (Stratfor)
i don't know whether i should scream or cry, or both .... so sad, just read his charge against the system in his sentencing statement in front of a NY court below ... and yes, STAY STRONG AND KEEP STRUGGLING! (his last sentence) ... omg, it remembers me so strongly on aaron schwartz, so sad again ... well, what can i do today / soon in order to help to crash this unfair military-financial system? ok, i will join other activists in a presentation / workshop how to succeed in resistance against the system by jörg bergstedt and yes, i've made a donation for the sparrownet activists right now ... dear activists and hactivists, please STAY STRONG AND KEEP STRUGGLING
[NEW YORK, NY] Jeremy Hammond, a 28-year-old political activist, was sentenced today to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to participating in the Anonymous hack into the computers of the private intelligence firm Strategic Forecasting (Stratfor). The Ceremonial Courtroom at the Federal Court for the Southern District of New York was filled today with an outpouring of support by journalists, activists and other whistleblowers who see Jeremy Hammond’s actions as a form of civil disobedience, motivated by a desire to protest and expose the secret activities of private intelligence corporations.
The hearing opened with arguments as to what sections of the court record will remain redacted after sentencing. While Jeremy’s attorneys initially erred on the side of caution in previous memorandums and kept large pieces of the record redacted, both the defense and prosecution agreed this morning that many of the sections should now be made available for public view. The prosecution, however took stiff exception to portions of the court record being made public that indicate victims, specifically foreign governments, that Jeremy allegedly hacked under the direction of Hector “Sabu” Monsegur, the FBI informant at the helm of Jeremy’s alleged actions. Judge Preska ordered that the names of these foreign governments remain sealed.
Jeremy’s counsel, Sarah Kunstler, who is 9 months pregnant and due to give birth today, delivered a passionate testimonial as to the person that Jeremy is, and the need for people like Jeremy during this era of exponential changes in our socio-political landscape. She was followed by co-counsel, Susan Kellman, who wept as she recalled her own experiences reading the hundreds of letters from supporters to the court detailing Jeremy Hammond’s unbridled selflessness and enthusiastic volunteerism. She pointed out that it was this same selflessness that motivated Jeremy’s actions in this case. She closed her testimony by underscoring that, “The centerpiece of our argument is a young man with high hopes and unbelievably laudable expectations in this world.”
Susan was followed by Jeremy Hammond himself, who gave a detailed, touching and consequential allocution to the court. The following is Jeremy’s statement to the court. We have redacted a portion [marked in red] upon the orders of Judge Preska. While we believe the public has a right to know the redacted information therein, we refuse to publish information that could adversely effect Jeremy or his counsel.
JEREMY HAMMOND’S SENTENCING STATEMENT | 11/15/2013
Good morning. Thank you for this opportunity. My name is Jeremy Hammond and I’m here to be sentenced for hacking activities carried out during my involvement with Anonymous. I have been locked up at MCC for the past 20 months and have had a lot of time to think about how I would explain my actions.
Before I begin, I want to take a moment to recognize the work of the people who have supported me. I want to thank all the lawyers and others who worked on my case: Elizabeth Fink, Susan Kellman, Sarah Kunstler, Emily Kunstler, Margaret Kunstler, and Grainne O’Neill. I also want to thank the National Lawyers Guild, the Jeremy Hammond Defense Committee and Support Network, Free Anons, the Anonymous Solidarity Network, Anarchist Black Cross, and all others who have helped me by writing a letter of support, sending me letters, attending my court dates, and spreading the word about my case. I also want to shout out my brothers and sisters behind bars and those who are still out there fighting the power.
The acts of civil disobedience and direct action that I am being sentenced for today are in line with the principles of community and equality that have guided my life. I hacked into dozens of high profile corporations and government institutions, understanding very clearly that what I was doing was against the law, and that my actions could land me back in federal prison. But I felt that I had an obligation to use my skills to expose and confront injustice—and to bring the truth to light.
Could I have achieved the same goals through legal means? I have tried everything from voting petitions to peaceful protest and have found that those in power do not want the truth to be exposed. When we speak truth to power we are ignored at best and brutally suppressed at worst. We are confronting a power structure that does not respect its own system of checks and balances, never mind the rights of it’s own citizens or the international community.
My introduction to politics was when George W. Bush stole the Presidential election in 2000, then took advantage of the waves of racism and patriotism after 9/11 to launch unprovoked imperialist wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. I took to the streets in protest naively believing our voices would be heard in Washington and we could stop the war. Instead, we were labeled as traitors, beaten, and arrested.
I have been arrested for numerous acts of civil disobedience on the streets of Chicago, but it wasn’t until 2005 that I used my computer skills to break the law in political protest. I was arrested by the FBI for hacking into the computer systems of a right-wing, pro-war group called Protest Warrior, an organization that sold racist t-shirts on their website and harassed anti-war groups. I was charged under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and the “intended loss” in my case was arbitrarily calculated by multiplying the 5000 credit cards in Protest Warrior’s database by $500, resulting in a total of $2.5 million.My sentencing guidelines were calculated on the basis of this “loss,” even though not a single credit card was used or distributed – by me or anyone else. I was sentenced to two years in prison.
While in prison I have seen for myself the ugly reality of how the criminal justice system destroys the lives of the millions of people held captive behind bars. The experience solidified my opposition to repressive forms of power and the importance of standing up for what you believe.
When I was released, I was eager to continue my involvement in struggles for social change. I didn’t want to go back to prison, so I focused on above-ground community organizing. But over time, I became frustrated with the limitations, of peaceful protest, seeing it as reformist and ineffective. The Obama administration continued the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, escalated the use of drones, and failed to close Guantanamo Bay.
Around this time, I was following the work of groups like Wikileaks and Anonymous. It was very inspiring to see the ideas of hactivism coming to fruition. I was particularly moved by the heroic actions of Chelsea Manning, who had exposed the atrocities committed by U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. She took an enormous personal risk to leak this information – believing that the public had a right to know and hoping that her disclosures would be a positive step to end these abuses. It is heart-wrenching to hear about her cruel treatment in military lockup.
I thought long and hard about choosing this path again. I had to ask myself, if Chelsea Manning fell into the abysmal nightmare of prison fighting for the truth, could I in good conscience do any less, if I was able? I thought the best way to demonstrate solidarity was to continue the work of exposing and confronting corruption.
I was drawn to Anonymous because I believe in autonomous, decentralized direct action. At the time Anonymous was involved in operations in support of the Arab Spring uprisings, against censorship, and in defense of Wikileaks. I had a lot to contribute, including technical skills, and how to better articulate ideas and goals. It was an exciting time – the birth of a digital dissent movement, where the definitions and capabilities of hacktivism were being shaped.
I was especially interested in the work of the hackers of LulzSec who were breaking into some significant targets and becoming increasingly political. Around this time, I first started talking to Sabu, who was very open about the hacks he supposedly committed, and was encouraging hackers to unite and attack major government and corporate systems under the banner of Anti Security. But very early in my involvement, the other Lulzsec hackers were arrested, leaving me to break into systems and write press releases. Later, I would learn that Sabu had been the first one arrested, and that the entire time I was talking to him he was an FBI informant.
Anonymous was also involved in the early stages of Occupy Wall Street. I was regularly participating on the streets as part of Occupy Chicago and was very excited to see a worldwide mass movement against the injustices of capitalism and racism. In several short months, the “Occupations” came to an end, closed by police crackdowns and mass arrests of protestors who were kicked out of their own public parks. The repression of Anonymous and the Occupy Movement set the tone for Antisec in the following months – the majority of our hacks against police targets were in retaliation for the arrests of our comrades.
I targeted law enforcement systems because of the racism and inequality with which the criminal law is enforced. I targeted the manufacturers and distributors of military and police equipment who profit from weaponry used to advance U.S. political and economic interests abroad and to repress people at home. I targeted information security firms because they work in secret to protect government and corporate interests at the expense of individual rights, undermining and discrediting activists, journalists and other truth seekers, and spreading disinformation.
I had never even heard of Stratfor until Sabu brought it to my attention. Sabu was encouraging people to invade systems, and helping to strategize and facilitate attacks. He even provided me with vulnerabilities of targets passed on by other hackers, so it came as a great surprise when I learned that Sabu had been working with the FBI the entire time.
On December 4, 2011, Sabu was approached by another hacker who had already broken into Stratfor’s credit card database. Sabu, under the watchful eye of his government handlers, then brought the hack to Antisec by inviting this hacker to our private chatroom, where he supplied download links to the full credit card database as well as the initial vulnerability access point to Stratfor’s systems.
I spent some time researching Stratfor and reviewing the information we were given, and decided that their activities and client base made them a deserving target. I did find it ironic that Stratfor’s wealthy and powerful customer base had their credit cards used to donate to humanitarian organizations, but my main role in the attack was to retrieve Stratfor’s private email spools which is where all the dirty secrets are typically found.
It took me more than a week to gain further access into Stratfor’s internal systems, but I eventually broke into their mail server. There was so much information, we needed several servers of our own in order to transfer the emails. Sabu, who was involved with the operation at every step, offered a server, which was provided and monitored by the FBI. Over the next weeks, the emails were transferred, the credit cards were used for donations, and Stratfor’s systems were defaced and destroyed. Why the FBI would introduce us to the hacker who found the initial vulnerability and allow this hack to continue remains a mystery.
As a result of the Stratfor hack, some of the dangers of the unregulated private intelligence industry are now known. It has been revealed through Wikileaks and other journalists around the world that Stratfor maintained a worldwide network of informants that they used to engage in intrusive and possibly illegal surveillance activities on behalf of large multinational corporations.
After Stratfor, I continued to break into other targets, using a powerful “zero day exploit” allowing me administrator access to systems running the popular Plesk webhosting platform. Sabu asked me many times for access to this exploit, which I refused to give him. Without his own independent access, Sabu continued to supply me with lists of vulnerable targets. I broke into numerous websites he supplied, uploaded the stolen email accounts and databases onto Sabu’s FBI server, and handed over passwords and backdoors that enabled Sabu (and, by extension, his FBI handlers) to control these targets.
These intrusions, all of which were suggested by Sabu while cooperating with the FBI, affected thousands of domain names and consisted largely of foreign government websites, including those of XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX, XXXX, XXXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX and the XXXXXX XXXXXXX. In one instance, Sabu and I provided access information to hackers who went on to deface and destroy many government websites in XXXXXX. I don’t know how other information I provided to him may have been used, but I think the government’s collection and use of this data needs to be investigated.
The government celebrates my conviction and imprisonment, hoping that it will close the door on the full story. I took responsibility for my actions, by pleading guilty, but when will the government be made to answer for its crimes?
The U.S. hypes the threat of hackers in order to justify the multi billion dollar cyber security industrial complex, but it is also responsible for the same conduct it aggressively prosecutes and claims to work to prevent. The hypocrisy of “law and order” and the injustices caused by capitalism cannot be cured by institutional reform but through civil disobedience and direct action. Yes I broke the law, but I believe that sometimes laws must be broken in order to make room for change.
In the immortal word of Frederick Douglas, “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”
This is not to say that I do not have any regrets. I realize that I released the personal information of innocent people who had nothing to do with the operations of the institutions I targeted. I apologize for the release of data that was harmful to individuals and irrelevant to my goals. I believe in the individual right to privacy – from government surveillance, and from actors like myself, and I appreciate the irony of my own involvement in the trampling of these rights. I am committed to working to make this world a better place for all of us. I still believe in the importance of hactivism as a form of civil disobedience, but it is time for me to move on to other ways of seeking change. My time in prison has taken a toll on my family, friends, and community. I know I am needed at home. I recognize that 7 years ago I stood before a different federal judge, facing similar charges, but this does not lessen the sincerity of what I say to you today.
It has taken a lot for me to write this, to explain my actions, knowing that doing so — honestly — could cost me more years of my life in prison. I am aware that I could get as many as 10 years, but I hope that I do not, as I believe there is so much work to be done.
STAY STRONG AND KEEP STRUGGLING!
To schedule interviews with Jeremy Hammond’s attorneys and supporters following today’s sentencing please contact Andy Stepanian, 631.291.3010, email@example.com.
The Jeremy Hammond Defense Committee is a coalition of family members, activists, lawyers, and other supporters who are working together to protect free speech and to support Jeremy Hammond. The committee’s goal is to provide information to the public and the press, to organize events related to Jeremy’s case, and to support Jeremy while he is in jail. For more information, please visit http://freejeremy.net.
just few memos right now, the insights + pictures follow later. as for now, enjoy my old blog post about jörg bergstedt's speech about free societies free of domination HEREorHERE(and also order some of his books)
day #1: activism works. GMO-opponents won and corporations (monsanto, syngenta, bayer, kws, ...) + government + police + subsidized research organizations lost as there was no GMO plants planted in germany in 2013. none, my dears. presentation of the succesful strategies + Q&A
... a hot night and couch surfing in between ...
day #2: conspiracy theories seminar ...
8 rules how to detect the truth:
motiv? wer hat nutzen davon?
mission ist der hauptzweck, sache nur nebensächlich (propaganda)
oft genutzte vereinfachung / pauschalisieren
analogien (prüfen, ob sie passen)
projektion und axiome
zirkelschlüsse (A => B => A)
wörter, die selbstverständlichkeit suggerieren (mehrfach wissenschaftlich bewiesen, ...)
more details at www.kopfentlastung.de, i have bought a booklet about the issue, so i will probably enhance + translate these 8 points sometime in the future :-)
ok, hier etwas über herrschaftsfreie gesellschaft:
herrschaftsfreie welt: ein bereits funkionierendes beispiel? in der software industrie (wohl aufgrund der dort hohen gehälter, die schon bei paar wenigen arbeitstagen im monat die lebenskosten decken und den rest nutzen einige leute für 'gute sachen') gibt es open access + open source projekte wie z.b. LINUX, FIREFOX, WIKIPEDIA, wo es keine patente und ähnliches gibt, wo alles allen gehört und alle haben drauf zugriff und jede(r) die aktuelle lösung verbessern kann um sie so für allen besser zu machen ... eigentlich ganz einfach, oder? und ja, in so einer welt wäre geld überflüssig / nicht vorhanden, also ganz anders als die ständige in-wert-setzung von allem im kapitalismus ...